From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

BUTZ v. RINEHEART

Supreme Court of Florida. Special Division B
Jun 7, 1956
88 So. 2d 125 (Fla. 1956)

Opinion

March 28, 1956. Rehearing Denied June 7, 1956.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Manatee County, W.T. Harrison, J.

Shackleford, Farrior, Shannon Stallings, G.T. Shannon and Vernon W. Evans, Jr., Tampa, for appellant.

Dye Dye, Dewey A. Dye and Dewey A. Dye, Jr., Bradenton, for appellee.


This is an appeal from an order granting a new trial to plaintiff after the jury had returned a verdict in favor of defendant. The grounds of the trial judge's order were (1) undue emphasis on the law of contributory negligence in his charge to the jury, and (2) an erroneous charge on the law of the road, given at the request of the defendant.

We agree with the trial judge that his earlier charge on the law of the road was more appropriate in the circumstances of this case, and that it was error, under the facts here present, to give the charge requested by the defendant. This charge, and the repetition of the charges relating to contributory negligence, could reasonably have misled the jury to the plaintiff's detriment; and the trial judge properly exercised his discretion in granting a new trial.

Affirmed.

DREW, C.J., and TERRELL, ROBERTS and O'CONNELL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

BUTZ v. RINEHEART

Supreme Court of Florida. Special Division B
Jun 7, 1956
88 So. 2d 125 (Fla. 1956)
Case details for

BUTZ v. RINEHEART

Case Details

Full title:LAWRENCE P. BUTZ, APPELLANT, v. ELWOOD J. RINEHEART, APPELLEE

Court:Supreme Court of Florida. Special Division B

Date published: Jun 7, 1956

Citations

88 So. 2d 125 (Fla. 1956)

Citing Cases

Tampa Transit Lines v. Nickolai

Affirmed. See Lithgow Funeral Centers v. Loftin, Fla. 1952, 60 So.2d 745; Butz v. Rineheart, Fla. 1956, 88…

Royal Kitchen Cabinet Corp. v. Palcic

It clearly appears that the jury was not misled and that the instruction was not overemphasized. See Reliance…