From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Butler v. Outlaw

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Eastern Division
Apr 6, 2010
No. 2:08CV00192 JLH (E.D. Ark. Apr. 6, 2010)

Opinion

No. 2:08CV00192 JLH.

April 6, 2010


ORDER


The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray and the filed objections. After carefully considering these documents and making a de novo review of the record in this case, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. Judgment will be entered accordingly.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (docket entry #1) is DENIED, and this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Butler v. Outlaw

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Eastern Division
Apr 6, 2010
No. 2:08CV00192 JLH (E.D. Ark. Apr. 6, 2010)
Case details for

Butler v. Outlaw

Case Details

Full title:JOHNNY L. BUTLER REG. #12790-076 PETITIONER v. T.C. OUTLAW, Warden, FCI…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Eastern Division

Date published: Apr 6, 2010

Citations

No. 2:08CV00192 JLH (E.D. Ark. Apr. 6, 2010)

Citing Cases

Vaughan v. Hendrix

Thus, properly characterized, Vaughan is asserting a conditions of confinement claim that is not cognizable…

Todd v. Garrett

Such a claim is not cognizable under § 2241. See Vaughan v. Hendrix, No. 219CV00046DPMJTR, 2019 WL 4412290,…