From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Butler v. Davis

United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Northern Division
Dec 22, 2023
Civil Action 3:21-CV-533-DPJ-BWR (S.D. Miss. Dec. 22, 2023)

Opinion

Civil Action 3:21-CV-533-DPJ-BWR

12-22-2023

CHRISTOPHER DALE BUTLER PETITIONER v. JOSH DAVIS, Warden, and the STATE OF MISSISSIPPI RESPONDENTS


ORDER

DANIEL P. JORDAN III, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Christopher Dale Butler filed this petition for writ of habeas corpus [1] challenging his 2017 state-court conviction and sentence of 30 years' imprisonment for possession of more than one kilogram but fewer than five kilograms of marijuana under Mississippi Code sections 41-29-139(c)(2)(B)(4) (possession offense), 99-19-81 (habitual-criminal sentencing), and 41-29-147 (subsequent-offender sentencing). R&R [26] at 17-18; see generally Butler v. State, 292 So.3d 251 (Miss. Ct. App. 2019), cert. denied, 290 So.3d 753 (Miss. 2020). Respondents responded in opposition [10], and Butler replied [13]. United States Magistrate Judge Bradley W. Rath recommends dismissing the petition with prejudice. R&R [26] at 1. His Report and Recommendation issued on December 4, 2023; Butler had fourteen days to object. Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b)(2); see R&R [26] at 26 (advising Petitioner of deadline). Butler did not object within that period.

“When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b) advisory committee's note (1983), quoted in Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass'n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc), superseded on other grounds by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) as noted in Alexander v. Verizon Wireless Servs., L.L.C., 875 F.3d 243, 248 (5th Cir. 2017). Having reviewed the record and found no clear error, the Court accepts the well-reasoned recommendation of Judge Rath.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Bradley W. Rath [26] is adopted as the finding and holding of this Court. Respondents' request to dismiss, Ans. [10] at 40, is granted; the petition is dismissed with prejudice.

A separate judgment will be entered as required by Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED.


Summaries of

Butler v. Davis

United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Northern Division
Dec 22, 2023
Civil Action 3:21-CV-533-DPJ-BWR (S.D. Miss. Dec. 22, 2023)
Case details for

Butler v. Davis

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER DALE BUTLER PETITIONER v. JOSH DAVIS, Warden, and the STATE OF…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Northern Division

Date published: Dec 22, 2023

Citations

Civil Action 3:21-CV-533-DPJ-BWR (S.D. Miss. Dec. 22, 2023)