From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bussel v. Freedman

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jan 9, 1979
252 S.E.2d 511 (Ga. Ct. App. 1979)

Opinion

57063.

ARGUED JANUARY 3, 1979.

DECIDED JANUARY 9, 1979.

Medical malpractice. Fulton Superior Court. Before Judge Williams.

Malone Percilla, Thomas Wm. Malone, Jones Wilson, Robert P. Wilson, for appellant.

T. M. Smith, Jr., for appellee.


The sole issue in this appeal concerns a ruling of the trial judge pertaining to voir dire examination of jurors. The record on this issue consists of post-trial affidavits submitted by counsel; however, there is no proper stipulation by the parties of the proceedings. Counsel for appellant waived a recording of the voir dire and did not seek to complete the record at that time. The question presented requires a transcript of the proceedings or a proper stipulation. See Code Ann. § 6-805. In the absence thereof, we may not consider the issue presented. See Lake v. Hicks, 147 Ga. App. 175 ( 248 S.E.2d 236).

Judgment affirmed. Webb and Banke, JJ., concur.

ARGUED JANUARY 3, 1979 — DECIDED JANUARY 9, 1979.


Summaries of

Bussel v. Freedman

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jan 9, 1979
252 S.E.2d 511 (Ga. Ct. App. 1979)
Case details for

Bussel v. Freedman

Case Details

Full title:BUSSEL v. FREEDMAN

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Jan 9, 1979

Citations

252 S.E.2d 511 (Ga. Ct. App. 1979)
252 S.E.2d 511

Citing Cases

Taurus Productions v. Maryland c. Indus

Thus, the document is not properly before this court. It follows that in the absence of a transcript, the…

Elliott v. Georgia Baptist Convention, Georgia

Neither defendant's brief not the enumeration of error refers to the record or transcript (stipulation)…