From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Busick v. Barger

Supreme Court of Indiana
Dec 18, 1951
102 N.E.2d 499 (Ind. 1951)

Opinion

No. 28,803.

Filed December 18, 1951.

1. APPEAL — Briefs — Failure of Appellee To File Brief — Effect. — Where in an appeal from an interlocutory order appointing a temporary receiver without notice, the failure of the appellees to file a brief has the effect of confessing the errors asserted by the appellants and thus makes the order subject to reversal by the Supreme Court. p. 198.

2. APPEAL — Determination — Law of the Case — Former Decision of Supreme Court Granting Prohibition Law of the Case. — Where the Supreme Court in an original action for a writ of prohibition, had decided that the trial judge had no jurisdiction to appoint a temporary receiver in the cause and had ordered the temporary writ of prohibition made permanent, this decision became the law of the case in a subsequent appeal from an interlocutory order appointing a temporary receiver without notice in the same cause. p. 199.

From the Spencer Circuit Court, Urdix B. Ewing, Judge.

Action by Gene Barger and others against Caleb A. Busick and others, from an interlocutory order appointing a temporary receiver without notice, defendants appeal.

Reversed.

Paul F. Mason, of Rockport, and William L. Mitchell, of Evansville, for appellants.


This is an appeal from an interlocutory order appointing a temporary receiver without notice in cause number 4587 entitled Gene Barger, et al. v. Caleb A. Busick, et al., filed in 1. the Spencer Circuit Court. The appellees have filed no brief in answer to appellants' brief, which under our decisions, has the effect of confessing the errors asserted by appellants. Meadows v. Hickman (1947), 225 Ind. 146, 73 N.E.2d 343, and cases therein cited. This makes the order subject to reversal by this court.

Moreover, on December 13, 1951, this court, in an opinion by Judge Jasper, decided the trial judge had no jurisdiction to appoint the temporary receiver in this cause, and ordered 2. the temporary writ of prohibition made permanent. State ex rel. Busick, et al. v. Ewing, Judge, et al. (1951), 230 Ind. 188, 102 N.E.2d 370. This became the law of this case in this appeal. State ex rel. Joint County Park Board of Ripley, Dearborn and Decatur Counties v. Verbarg (1950), 228 Ind. 280, 91 N.E.2d 916.

The interlocutory order appointing a receiver without notice is reversed.

NOTE. — Reported in 102 N.E.2d 499.


Summaries of

Busick v. Barger

Supreme Court of Indiana
Dec 18, 1951
102 N.E.2d 499 (Ind. 1951)
Case details for

Busick v. Barger

Case Details

Full title:BUSICK ET AL. v. BARGER ET AL

Court:Supreme Court of Indiana

Date published: Dec 18, 1951

Citations

102 N.E.2d 499 (Ind. 1951)
102 N.E.2d 499

Citing Cases

Harrington v. Hartman

This rule is not for the benefit of the appellant, but for the protection of the court, and its invocation is…