Opinion
Argued January 10, 1899
Decided January 24, 1899
William L. Mathot for appellants.
J. Stewart Ross for respondent.
Order affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
All concur, except PARKER, Ch. J., and BARTLETT, J., dissenting.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Bushwick Savings Bank v. Traum
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 24, 1899
52 N.E. 1125 (N.Y. 1899)
Summaries of
Bushwick Savings Bank v. Traum
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 24, 1899
52 N.E. 1125 (N.Y. 1899)
Case details for
Bushwick Savings Bank v. Traum
Case Details
Full title:BUSHWICK SAVINGS BANK v . CAROLINE TRAUM et al. ROSA HERMANN et al., as…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Jan 24, 1899
Citations
52 N.E. 1125 (N.Y. 1899)
158 N.Y. 668
Citing Cases
Velleman v. Rohrig
Such appeals have been before us since the adoption of the revised Constitution, and we have uniformly held…