Opinion
Argued May 18, 1871
Decided September term, 1871
James L. Angle for the appellants.
James C. Cochrane for the respondent.
GRAY, HUNT and EARL, CC., read for affirmance.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
BUSH v. THE ROCHESTER CITY BANK ET AL
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Sep 1, 1871
48 N.Y. 659 (N.Y. 1871)
Summaries of
BUSH v. THE ROCHESTER CITY BANK ET AL
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Sep 1, 1871
48 N.Y. 659 (N.Y. 1871)
Case details for
BUSH v. THE ROCHESTER CITY BANK ET AL
Case Details
Full title:WILLIAM C. BUSH, Respondent, v . THE ROCHESTER CITY BANK et al., Appellants
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Sep 1, 1871
Citations
48 N.Y. 659 (N.Y. 1871)
Citing Cases
Stout v. Mercer
McFarland v. Pierce (1897), 151 Ind. 546, 548, 45 N.E. 706, said of that statute: `The word "aggrieved" in…
City of Hammond v. Bd. of Zoning AppealsMcFarland v. Pierce (1897), 151 Ind. 546, 548, 45 N.E. 706, said of that statute: `The word "aggrieved" in…