From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Burton v. Lichtenstadter

Supreme Court of Delaware
Apr 25, 2000
755 A.2d 387 (Del. 2000)

Opinion

No. 76, 1999.

Decided: April 25, 2000.

Superior, CA 99M-01-084

Affirmed.


Unpublished Opinion is below.

WILLIAM D. BURTON, III, Plaintiff-Below, Appellant, v. MARLENE LICHTENSTADTER, Respondent-Below, Appellee. No. 76, 1999. In the Supreme Court of the State of Delaware. Submitted: April 4, 2000. Decided: April 25, 2000.

Court Below: Superior Court of the State of Delaware, in and for New Castle County C.A. No. 99M-01-084.

Before VEASEY, Chief Justice, HOLLAND and HARTNETT, Justices.

ORDER

MAURICE A. HARTNETT, III, Justice.

This 25th day of April 2000, upon consideration of the briefs of the parties and the Superior Court's Response to the September 23, 1999 Order of Remand by this Court to the Superior Court, it appears to this Court that the judgment of the Superior Court should be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons set forth in the Superior Court's Response to Order of Remand filed on December 17, 1999 in this Court.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior Court be, and the same hereby is, AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Burton v. Lichtenstadter

Supreme Court of Delaware
Apr 25, 2000
755 A.2d 387 (Del. 2000)
Case details for

Burton v. Lichtenstadter

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM D. BURTON, III, Plaintiff-Below, Appellant, v. MARLENE…

Court:Supreme Court of Delaware

Date published: Apr 25, 2000

Citations

755 A.2d 387 (Del. 2000)

Citing Cases

Mell v. New Castle County

At oral argument, some question was raised vel non the unavailability of other adequate remedies at law was a…