From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

BURTAINE v. BARR

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 1, 1920
194 App. Div. 906 (N.Y. App. Div. 1920)

Opinion

November, 1920.


The order should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings denied, with ten dollars costs. A temporary receiver appointed in a foreclosure action has no authority to oust tenants in lawful possession under existing leases made by the owner of the property. His possession is subject to the tenancies in existence at the date of his appointment. Appointment of such receiver does not transfer title to the property. Jenks, P.J., Rich, Putnam, Blackmar and Kelly, JJ., concur. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings denied, with ten dollars costs.


Summaries of

BURTAINE v. BARR

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 1, 1920
194 App. Div. 906 (N.Y. App. Div. 1920)
Case details for

BURTAINE v. BARR

Case Details

Full title:PHILIP BURTAINE, Respondent, v . ADOLPH BARR and MAX BARR, Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 1, 1920

Citations

194 App. Div. 906 (N.Y. App. Div. 1920)

Citing Cases

TITLE GUARANTEE T. CO. v. 457 SCHENECTADY AVE

The net amount, in case of a deficiency, is to be applied in satisfaction of the deficiency judgment,…