From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Burroughs Wellcome Co. v. Weissbard

Court of Chancery and Prerogative Court
Jan 9, 1942
23 A.2d 396 (N.J. 1942)

Opinion

Decided January 9th, 1942.

On appeal from a decree of the Court of Chancery.

Messrs. Gross Blumberg, for the respondent.

Messrs. Bilder, Bilder Kaufman, for the appellants.


The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Egan and reported at 129 N.J. Eq. 563. For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PORTER, COLIE, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, THOMPSON, JJ. 12.

For reversal — CASE, PERSKIE, JJ. 2.


Summaries of

Burroughs Wellcome Co. v. Weissbard

Court of Chancery and Prerogative Court
Jan 9, 1942
23 A.2d 396 (N.J. 1942)
Case details for

Burroughs Wellcome Co. v. Weissbard

Case Details

Full title:BURROUGHS WELLCOME CO. (U.S.A.), INC., respondent, v. HARRY WEISSBARD et…

Court:Court of Chancery and Prerogative Court

Date published: Jan 9, 1942

Citations

23 A.2d 396 (N.J. 1942)
23 A.2d 396

Citing Cases

Texas Co. v. DiGaetano

We come now specifically to the effect of the plaintiff's 1958 exclusion of commercial accounts from the…

Texas Co. v. Di Gaetano

The issue here is not, as plaintiff would have it, the validity of the exemption it has promulgated, as such.…