From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Burroughs v. Burroughs

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 18, 1999
262 A.D.2d 993 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

June 18, 1999

Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Joslin, J. — Matrimonial.

PRESENT: GREEN, J. P., PINE, WISNER, HURLBUTT AND BALIO, JJ.


Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and matter remitted to Supreme Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in denying without a hearing plaintiff's application pursuant to Domestic Relations Law § 244 for an order directing the entry of judgment for maintenance arrears. "A motion under Domestic Relations Law § 244 Dom. Rel. is akin to a motion for summary judgment and should not be resolved without a hearing if the motion papers raise material issues of fact ( Pecukonis v. Pecukonis, 49 A.D.2d 985; see, Switzer v. Switzer, 114 A.D.2d 499)" ( Curtis v. Curtis, 132 A.D.2d 850, 853) The parties' submissions raise factual issues with respect to the amount of arrears allegedly due. Thus, we remit the matter to Supreme Court to conduct a hearing to resolve those issues ( see, Rogers v. Rogers, 151 A.D.2d 738; Curtis v. Curtis, supra, at 853).


Summaries of

Burroughs v. Burroughs

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 18, 1999
262 A.D.2d 993 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Burroughs v. Burroughs

Case Details

Full title:NORINE M. BURROUGHS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. WALTER J. BURROUGHS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jun 18, 1999

Citations

262 A.D.2d 993 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
692 N.Y.S.2d 276

Citing Cases

Paladino v. Paladino

Plaintiff makes no such claim in his affidavit; however, he infers that defendant acquiesced in his practice…

Paladino v. Paladino

Plaintiff makes no such claim in his affidavit; however he infers that defendant acquiesced in his practice…