From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Burometto v. Town of Schodack

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 17, 1981
85 A.D.2d 805 (N.Y. App. Div. 1981)

Opinion

December 17, 1981


Appeal from a decision of the Supreme Court at Special Term (Prior, Jr., J.), dated March 19, 1981, which denied plaintiff's motion for a default judgment and dismissed the complaint. Since a review of the record on this appeal does not indicate that a judgment or order was entered, but, rather, that plaintiff is attempting to appeal from the decision of Special Term, the appeal must be dismissed (see CPLR 5512, subd [a]). Moreover, had the appeal been properly taken, Special Term's actions in denying the motion for a default judgment and in dismissing the complaint would be affirmed. Appeal dismissed, without costs. Mahoney, P.J., Sweeney, Kane, Casey and Weiss, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Burometto v. Town of Schodack

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 17, 1981
85 A.D.2d 805 (N.Y. App. Div. 1981)
Case details for

Burometto v. Town of Schodack

Case Details

Full title:VINCENT B. BUROMETTO, Appellant, v. TOWN OF SCHODACK, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Dec 17, 1981

Citations

85 A.D.2d 805 (N.Y. App. Div. 1981)

Citing Cases

Westport Aviation Corporation v. Kuntz

Regardless of whether defendant is correct in arguing that plaintiff could not properly bring an action in…

People ex rel. Frazier v. Fogg

The decision by Special Term was never reduced to a judgment or order. As a general rule, no appeal lies…