From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Burnstein v. Haas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 28, 1947
272 A.D. 1051 (N.Y. App. Div. 1947)

Opinion

November 28, 1947.

Present — Peck, P.J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.; Dore, J., dissents and votes to affirm. Settle order on notice.


Judgment reversed on the facts and the law and complaint dismissed upon the grounds: (1) That no actionable negligence was shown in that (a) the risk was not foreseeable by the defendant in the exercise of reasonable care, and (b) the proof was insufficient to show any dangerously defective condition of which the defendant would have notice upon reasonable inspection of the premises. (2) If there was any defect in the condition of the coping stone of which the defendant could be charged with notice, the plaintiff had equal notice thereof and was guilty of contributory negligence in fastening a rope to the coping stone for the purpose of supporting the scaffold.


Summaries of

Burnstein v. Haas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 28, 1947
272 A.D. 1051 (N.Y. App. Div. 1947)
Case details for

Burnstein v. Haas

Case Details

Full title:LOUIS BURNSTEIN, Respondent, v. EDA HAAS, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 28, 1947

Citations

272 A.D. 1051 (N.Y. App. Div. 1947)

Citing Cases

Tropea v. Shell Oil Company

Storr v. New York Cent. R. Co., 261 N.Y. 348, 351, 185 N.E. 407, 408 (1933). The defendant Maripet cites us…

Mendes v. Caristo Constr. Corp.

In reversing a judgment recovered by the plaintiff and dismissing the complaint, we held ( Glass v.…