Summary
granting summary judgment on assumption of risk, in part, because plaintiff used same icy staircase three days in a row before slipping
Summary of this case from Manchanda v. Hays Worldwide, LLCOpinion
No. 12-1903
01-07-2013
RAYMOND S. BURNS, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY, Defendant - Appellee, and COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; NORTHERN VIRGINIA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION; NORTHERN VIRGINIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY; VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Defendants.
Kevin M. Leach, TURBITT, O'HERRON & LEACH, PLLC, Burke, Virginia, for Appellant. Nicholas S. Nunzio, Jr., Associate General Counsel, Carol B. O'Keeffe, General Counsel, Gerard J. Stief, Senior Associate General Counsel, Washington, DC, for Appellee.
UNPUBLISHED
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:12-cv-00123-CMH-TRJ) Before AGEE, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kevin M. Leach, TURBITT, O'HERRON & LEACH, PLLC, Burke, Virginia, for Appellant. Nicholas S. Nunzio, Jr., Associate General Counsel, Carol B. O'Keeffe, General Counsel, Gerard J. Stief, Senior Associate General Counsel, Washington, DC, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Raymond S. Burns, Jr. appeals the district court's order granting the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority's motion for summary judgment on his negligence complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Burns v. Wash. Metro. Area Transit Auth., No. 1:12-cv-00123-CMH-TRJ (E.D. Va. July 13, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED