Opinion
03-15-2017
Louis BURNS, respondent, v. Stephanie BURNS, appellant, et al., defendants.
Domenick Napoletano, Brooklyn, N.Y., for appellant. Reingold & Tucker, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Abraham Reingold of counsel), for respondent.
Domenick Napoletano, Brooklyn, N.Y., for appellant.
Reingold & Tucker, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Abraham Reingold of counsel), for respondent.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kenneth P. Sherman, J.), dated October 18, 2016. The order denied the motion of the defendant Stephanie Burns to strike the plaintiff's jury demand.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
"A jury trial is guaranteed in an action ‘for determination of a claim to real property under [RPAPL article 15]’ " ( Paciello v. Graffeo, 8 A.D.3d 543, 543, 779 N.Y.S.2d 526, quoting CPLR 4101[2] ). Although the plaintiff did not characterize or refer to his causes of action to recover possession of real property as claims pursuant to RPAPL article 15, he was nevertheless entitled to a jury trial on those causes of action (see Paciello v. Graffeo, 8 A.D.3d 543, 779 N.Y.S.2d 526 ; see also Howard v. Murray, 38 N.Y.2d 695, 699–700, 382 N.Y.S.2d 470, 346 N.E.2d 238 ). Moreover, regardless of whether the plaintiff's causes of action to recover the subject properties are equitable in nature, he is statutorily entitled to a jury trial on those causes of action (see City of Syracuse v. Hogan, 234 N.Y. 457, 462, 138 N.E. 406 ) and, thus, he did not waive his right to a jury trial by joining legal and equitable claims (see Paciello v. Graffeo, 8 A.D.3d at 543, 779 N.Y.S.2d 526 ). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the defendant Stephanie Burns' motion to strike the plaintiff's jury demand.
LEVENTHAL, J.P., COHEN, HINDS–RADIX and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.