From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Burleson v. State

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma
May 31, 1930
288 P. 989 (Okla. Crim. App. 1930)

Opinion

No. A-7480.

Opinion Filed May 31, 1930.

Searches and Seizures — Description of Premises in Affidavit for Warrant Held Insufficient. A description in an affidavit for a search warrant describing the premises, "as his residence, outhouses and premises and lands farmed and controlled by him located about two miles west and about one-fourth mile north of Vernon, Oklahoma, in McIntosh County," is too vague and indefinite to authorize the issuance of a search warrant or the search of such premises.

Appeal from County Court, McIntosh County; Horace B. Reubelt, Judge.

Monroe Burleson was convicted of violating the prohibitory liquor law, and he appeals. Reversed.

Roy White, for plaintiff in error.

The Attorney General, for the State.


Plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the county court of McIntosh county on a charge of having unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor, and his punishment fixed by the jury at a fine of $100 and confinement in the county jail for a period of 30 days.

The officer, before searching defendant's premises, filed an affidavit for a search warrant describing the premises of the defendant as set forth in the syllabus of this case. The description in the search warrant was the same as that in the affidavit.

Section 30, article 2, of the Bill of Rights of the Constitution of Oklahoma, provides:

"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable searches or seizures shall not be violated; and no warrant shall issue but upon probable cause supported by oath or affirmation, describing as particularly as may be the place to be searched and the person or thing to be seized."

The description of the premises in the case at bar in no wise complies with the requirements of section 30, art. 2, supra. The only evidence offered in the case being that obtained under the insufficient affidavit and search warrant, the court should have sustained the defendant's request and directed the jury to return a verdict of not guilty.

For the reasons stated, the cause is reversed.


Summaries of

Burleson v. State

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma
May 31, 1930
288 P. 989 (Okla. Crim. App. 1930)
Case details for

Burleson v. State

Case Details

Full title:MONROE BURLESON v. STATE

Court:Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma

Date published: May 31, 1930

Citations

288 P. 989 (Okla. Crim. App. 1930)
288 P. 989

Citing Cases

White v. State

It has been many times held by this court that a search warrant must so particularly describe the place to be…

Smithson v. State

The officer, before searching defendant's premises, obtained a search warrant describing the premises of the…