From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lyles v. Beto

United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division
Feb 19, 1963
32 F.R.D. 248 (S.D. Tex. 1963)

Opinion

         Proceeding on petition for writ of habeas corpus in which the petitioner moved for subpoena of witnesses. The District Court, Ingraham, J., held that subpoenas would be denied in accordance with rule since witnesses were not within the judicial district and were not within 100 miles of the place of hearing or trial.

         Motion denied.

          Charles W. Gill, Houston, Tex., for petitioner.

          J. G. Davis, Asst. Atty. Gen. of Texas, Huntsville, Tex., for respondent.


          INGRAHAM, District Judge.

         The petitioner, Burl Eugene Lyles, has filed a motion for subpoena of six witnesses, five of whom are alleged to reside at Odessa, Texas, and one at Tyler, Texas.

          The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is a civil action and is governed by the civil rules. Rule 45(e)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides the following relative to the subpoena of witnesses for a hearing or trial:

         ‘ * * * A subpoena requiring the attendance of a witness at a hearing or trial may be served at any place within the district, or at any place without the district that is within 100 miles of the place of the hearing or trial specified in the subpoena; * * *.’

         Odessa and Tyler, Texas, are not within the Southern District or Texas and are not within 100 miles of the place of the hearing or trial, Houston, Texas.

         The motion is accordingly denied.

         The clerk will forward true copies hereof to counsel and the petitioner.


Summaries of

Lyles v. Beto

United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division
Feb 19, 1963
32 F.R.D. 248 (S.D. Tex. 1963)
Case details for

Lyles v. Beto

Case Details

Full title:Burl Eugene LYLES, Petitioner, v. Dr. George J. BETO, Director, Texas…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division

Date published: Feb 19, 1963

Citations

32 F.R.D. 248 (S.D. Tex. 1963)
7 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1241

Citing Cases

United States v. Stricker

Ball's attempt to quash the subpoena under Rule 45 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is also…

Adderly v. Wainwright

In consideration of this historic understanding and, apparently, with a cursory study of Rules 1, 2 and…