From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Burks v. Harris Co. District Clerk

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Jun 30, 2010
No. WR-72,881-02 (Tex. Crim. App. Jun. 30, 2010)

Opinion

No. WR-72,881-02

Filed: June 30, 2010. DO NOT PUBLISH.

On Application for a Writ of Mandamus Cause No. 843968 in the 208th Judicial District Court from Harris County.


ORDER


Relator has filed a motion for leave to file a writ of mandamus pursuant to the original jurisdiction of this Court. In it, he contends that in 2003, he filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus in the 208th Judicial District Court of Harris County, that more than 35 days have elapsed, and that the application has not yet been forwarded to this Court. On June 10, 2010, after abating this application, we received a copy of a proposed order designating issues to be investigated signed on October 30, 2003 by the Honorable Denise Collins. On this record, the District Clerk has not violated his ministerial duties under Article 11.07, § 3(b) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Accordingly, we deny leave to file. We note, however, that Relator's habeas application has been pending in the trial court for approximately six years and eight months. We hesitate to say how many days or months a trial court should have to make findings of fact and conclusions of law, but in Relator's case we believe six years and eight months is unreasonable. We urge the trial court to promptly make findings of fact and conclusions of law.


Summaries of

Burks v. Harris Co. District Clerk

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Jun 30, 2010
No. WR-72,881-02 (Tex. Crim. App. Jun. 30, 2010)
Case details for

Burks v. Harris Co. District Clerk

Case Details

Full title:LAMAR BURKS, Relator v. HARRIS COUNTY DISTRICT CLERK, Respondent

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Jun 30, 2010

Citations

No. WR-72,881-02 (Tex. Crim. App. Jun. 30, 2010)

Citing Cases

Burks v. Thaler

Despite the passage of seven years, there is no indication that the state trial court has acted on that…