From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Burkland v. Int'l Business Machines Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 30, 1996
226 A.D.2d 316 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

April 30, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Alice Schlesinger, J.).


Plaintiff has failed to establish by admissible evidence that the employer's justification for his discharge was pretextual; or, the existence of a triable issue of fact that he satisfactorily performed his job as a systems analyst during the period in question; or, that his involuntary retirement from International Business Machines was for other, impermissible reasons than those attested to by his supervisors. We have considered plaintiff's other points and find them unpersuasive.

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Wallach, Kupferman and Tom, JJ.


Summaries of

Burkland v. Int'l Business Machines Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 30, 1996
226 A.D.2d 316 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Burkland v. Int'l Business Machines Corp.

Case Details

Full title:GARY BURKLAND, Appellant-Respondent, v. INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 30, 1996

Citations

226 A.D.2d 316 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
642 N.Y.S.2d 501