From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Burke v. Town of Walpole

United States District Court, D. Massachusetts
Aug 5, 2003
CIVIL ACTION NO. 00-10376-GAO (D. Mass. Aug. 5, 2003)

Summary

holding that allegation that medical examiner fabricated false evidence, leading to plaintiff's arrest and detention without probable cause, sufficient to state claim for IIED

Summary of this case from Echavarria v. Roach

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 00-10376-GAO

August 5, 2003


ORDER


On May 15, 2003, Magistrate Judge Cohen filed a Report and Recommendation as to the disposition of certain pending motions to dismiss. Having reviewed the Report as well as the objections to it thereafter received from the plaintiff and the defendant Kathleen M. Crowley, I adopt the Report and its Recommendations with one exception: I conclude that the claim against defendant Crowley for violation of the Massachusetts Civil Rights Act also ought to be dismissed because the plaintiff has not adequately pleaded facts that, if believed, would prove that any interference by Crowley with the plaintiff's rights was accomplished by means of "threats, intimidation or coercion" as required by the state statute, Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 12, § 11H.

Accordingly, Crowley's motion to dismiss (Dkt. no. 138) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The following claims are dismissed: Counts 3, 4, 7, 10 (to the extent based upon the execution of the warrant or upon conversion), 11, and 14.

The motions of the defendants Kessler (Dkt. no. 141) and Evans (Dkt. no. 157) to dismiss Count 13 are GRANTED.

It is SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Burke v. Town of Walpole

United States District Court, D. Massachusetts
Aug 5, 2003
CIVIL ACTION NO. 00-10376-GAO (D. Mass. Aug. 5, 2003)

holding that allegation that medical examiner fabricated false evidence, leading to plaintiff's arrest and detention without probable cause, sufficient to state claim for IIED

Summary of this case from Echavarria v. Roach

adopting magistrate judge's report and recommendation on motion to dismiss

Summary of this case from Burke v. Town of Walpole
Case details for

Burke v. Town of Walpole

Case Details

Full title:EDMUND F. BURKE, Plaintiff, v. TOWN OF WALPOLE, et al, Defendants

Court:United States District Court, D. Massachusetts

Date published: Aug 5, 2003

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 00-10376-GAO (D. Mass. Aug. 5, 2003)

Citing Cases

Tuckerbrook Alt. Invs., LP v. Banerjee

Massachusetts courts have therefore typically required plaintiffs to plead the elements of defamation with…

Echavarria v. Roach

This is sufficient to support a claim for IIED. See Bazinet v. Thorpe, 190 F. Supp. 3d 229, 240 (D. Mass.…