From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Burke v. R.R

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Sep 1, 1962
257 N.C. 683 (N.C. 1962)

Opinion

Filed 26 September 1962.

Appeal and Error 39 — Where the Justices of the Supreme Court are evenly divided in opinion one Justice not sitting, the judgment of the lower court will be affirmed without becoming a precedent.

APPEAL by plaintiff from Sharp, S.J., January 15, 1962 Term, GASTON Superior Court.

Frank Battley Rankin for plaintiff appellant.

W. T. Joyner, Geo. B. Mason, Mullen, Holland Cooke, by James Mullen for defendant appellee.


In this civil action the plaintiff sought to recover damages for his personal injury sustained while he was attempting to hold in place boxes of freight in a partially loaded car during shifting operations. The plaintiff alleged: "The engineer of the defendant operated the defendant's engine wantonly and recklessly and without regard to . . . the safety of the plaintiff."

The defendant, by answer, denied negligence and pleaded (conditionally) the plaintiff's contributory negligence.

At the close of the plaintiff's evidence the court allowed defendant's motion for involuntary nonsuit. From judgment dismissing the action, the plaintiff appealed.


Justice Sharp, having presided in the court below, did not participate in the decision here. The other Justices, being equally divided as to the propriety of the nonsuit, the judgment of the superior court is affirmed without the decision becoming a precedent.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Burke v. R.R

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Sep 1, 1962
257 N.C. 683 (N.C. 1962)
Case details for

Burke v. R.R

Case Details

Full title:WILBURN MARLIN BURKE v. CAROLINA NORTHWESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Sep 1, 1962

Citations

257 N.C. 683 (N.C. 1962)
127 S.E.2d 281

Citing Cases

Sykes v. Health Network Sols., Inc.

As to plaintiffs’ antitrust claims, the members of the Court are equally divided; accordingly, the decision…

State v. Johnson

He does not sit in this appeal. The remaining six justices being equally divided in opinion as to whether…