From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Burke v. Burke

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 14, 1992
185 A.D.2d 625 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

July 14, 1992

Appeal from the Family Court, Erie County, LoRusso, J.

Present — Callahan, J.P., Green, Lawton, Boehm and Davis, JJ.


Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: It was error for Family Court to award respondent counsel fees in the sum of $4,500 for the anticipated costs of appeal (see, Sitarek v. Sitarek, 179 A.D.2d 1065; Kieffer v. Kieffer, 163 A.D.2d 907, 908). From our review of the record, we further find that, in light of the equities presented and the financial circumstances of the parties, the remaining counsel fee award of $3,972.90, representing approximately one-half of the total fees requested, is a just award of counsel fees to defend the prior appeal. The order of Family Court is, therefore, modified to direct petitioner to contribute $3,972.90 toward respondent's counsel fees on the prior appeal.


Summaries of

Burke v. Burke

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 14, 1992
185 A.D.2d 625 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Burke v. Burke

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH T. BURKE, Appellant, v. LAURA A. BURKE, Respondent. (Appeal No. 2.)

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jul 14, 1992

Citations

185 A.D.2d 625 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
585 N.Y.S.2d 53

Citing Cases

Amy L.W. v. Brendan K.H.

We thus conclude that any error with respect to the alleged confidential report is harmless ( see id.; Matter…

Deep v. Clinton

In view of defendants' express agreement that plaintiff was entitled to apply to Supreme Court for an award…