From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Burchell v. Elbe Cab Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 31, 1958
5 A.D.2d 889 (N.Y. App. Div. 1958)

Opinion

March 31, 1958


In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the appeal is from an order denying a preference pursuant to rule 9 of the Kings County Supreme Court Rules. Order reversed, without costs, and preference granted pursuant to said rule. While it is true that, as the learned Justice at Trial Term indicated, the hospital X-ray report, dated four days subsequent to the accident, indicates that appellant had a degenerative process of the spinal discs which may have antedated the accident, the affidavit of her physician made a prima facie showing that such pre-existing injury was aggravated as a consequence of the accident. Under such circumstances, sufficient was indicated to warrant the granting of a preference under the rule. ( Congress v. Congress, 284 App. Div. 807; Weiner v. Kleiner, 282 App. Div. 107 8.) Murphy, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur; Wenzel, Acting P.J., and Beldock, J., dissent and vote to affirm the order.


Summaries of

Burchell v. Elbe Cab Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 31, 1958
5 A.D.2d 889 (N.Y. App. Div. 1958)
Case details for

Burchell v. Elbe Cab Corp.

Case Details

Full title:ELIZABETH G. BURCHELL, Appellant, v. ELBE CAB CORP. et al., Respondents…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 31, 1958

Citations

5 A.D.2d 889 (N.Y. App. Div. 1958)

Citing Cases

Lyons v. B J Auto Spring Equipment Co.

In our opinion, plaintiff made a satisfactory prima facie showing of injuries which could properly support a…

Fisher v. Smith

Whether the same result would have been reached in our Appellate Division had the injuries been contradicted…