From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Buonocore v. Dubois

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 31, 2005
16 A.D.3d 359 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

5774.

March 31, 2005.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Rosalyn Richter, J.), entered on or about November 17, 2004, which, inter alia, granted plaintiff's motion for summary judgment directing the release of certain escrowed funds to him, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Before: Ellerin, J.P., Nardelli, Williams, Gonzalez and Sweeny, JJ.


"When a condition of a mortgage loan commitment is not fulfilled through no fault of the purchasers, their performance is excused, as long as they acted in good faith" ( Lunning v. 10 Bleecker St. Owners Corp., 160 AD2d 178, lv denied 76 NY2d 710). Plaintiff established his prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by adducing documentary evidence showing that he had sought a mortgage diligently and in good faith. Defendants did not, in response, meet their burden to raise a triable factual issue.


Summaries of

Buonocore v. Dubois

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 31, 2005
16 A.D.3d 359 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

Buonocore v. Dubois

Case Details

Full title:DARREN BUONOCORE, Respondent, v. DALENA DUBOIS et al., Appellants, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 31, 2005

Citations

16 A.D.3d 359 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
791 N.Y.S.2d 436

Citing Cases

Tuli v. Cabgram Developers, LLC

That documentation was admissible ( Prudential Sec. v. Rovello, 262 A.D.2d 172, 692 N.Y.S.2d 67 [1st Dept.…

Tuli v. Cabgram Developers, LLC

That documentation was admissible (Prudential Sec. v Rovello, 262 A.D.2d 172 [1st Dept 1999]; Eldon Group Am.…