From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bunger v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jan 22, 1997
687 So. 2d 868 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Summary

noting that this court takes judicial notice of its records pursuant to section 90.202, Florida Statutes

Summary of this case from Rachel v. State

Opinion

Case No. 96-05050

Opinion filed January 22, 1997.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(g) from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Robert J. Simms, Judge.


Roger Bunger appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief. We reverse the trial court's order which stated that the motion was untimely.

Bunger was sentenced for multiple counts in Circuit Case No. 91-11882 on October 27, 1992. Bunger correctly alleges in his motion that this court affirmed his appeal of those sentences on November 30, 1994. See Bunger v. State, 646 So.2d 200 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). Our records confirm that the appeal involved the same circuit case number which is the subject of Bunger's motion. Bunger filed the motion for postconviction relief on October 15, 1994. In denying Bunger's motion, the trial court stated that no appeal was taken in this case and that more than two years had elapsed since Bunger's sentence was imposed. This court's records confirm that the trial judge mistakenly concluded that Bunger did not appeal the sentences in that case. Accordingly, we conclude that Bunger timely filed his motion within the two-year time limit permitted by Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850(b).

This court takes judicial notice of its records pursuant to section 90.202(6), Florida Statutes (1995).

For the purpose of filing a timely rule 3.850 motion, if no petition for writ of certiorari is filed, the judgment and sentence become final when the appellate court issues its mandate.Huff v. State, 569 So.2d 1247 (Fla. 1990).

We reverse the summary denial of Bunger's motion and remand this matter to the trial court. If the trial court again summarily denies the motion, it shall attach such portions of the record which conclusively refute Bunger's allegations. Any party aggrieved by the subsequent action of the trial court must file a notice of appeal within thirty days to obtain appellate review.

Reversed and remanded.

ALTENBERND and WHATLEY, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Bunger v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jan 22, 1997
687 So. 2d 868 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

noting that this court takes judicial notice of its records pursuant to section 90.202, Florida Statutes

Summary of this case from Rachel v. State
Case details for

Bunger v. State

Case Details

Full title:ROGER BUNGER, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Jan 22, 1997

Citations

687 So. 2d 868 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Citing Cases

Rachel v. State

Because the trial court's order failed to refute these claims, we remand Rachel's second claim for an…

Pena v. State

According to Pena, trial counsel admitted that he was unprepared and unsuccessfully sought a continuance. To…