From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bulsa v. State

United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Anderson/Greenwood Division
Dec 10, 2007
C.A. No.: 8:07-0816 (D.S.C. Dec. 10, 2007)

Opinion

C.A. No.: 8:07-0816.

December 10, 2007


ORDER


This matter is before the court for review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Bruce H. Hendricks, made in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 73.02 for the District of South Carolina.

The Magistrate Judge makes only a recommendation to this court. The recommendation has no presumptive weight. The responsibility to make a final determination remains with this court. See Mathews v. Weber, 423 U.S. 261, 270-71 (1976). The court is charged with making a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which specific objection is made, and the court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge or recommit the matter with instructions. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

The Petitioner filed no objections to the Report and Recommendation. In the absence of objections to the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, this court is not required to give any explanation for adopting the recommendation.See Camby v. Davis, 718 F.2d 198, 199 (4th Cir. 1983).

After a thorough review of the Report and Recommendation and the record in this case, the court adopts Magistrate Judge Hendricks' Report and Recommendation and incorporates it herein. It is therefore

ORDERED that the respondent's motion for summary judgment is hereby GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Bulsa v. State

United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Anderson/Greenwood Division
Dec 10, 2007
C.A. No.: 8:07-0816 (D.S.C. Dec. 10, 2007)
Case details for

Bulsa v. State

Case Details

Full title:Jason Bulsa, a/k/a Jason David Bulsa, Petitioner, v. State of South…

Court:United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Anderson/Greenwood Division

Date published: Dec 10, 2007

Citations

C.A. No.: 8:07-0816 (D.S.C. Dec. 10, 2007)

Citing Cases

Barnhill v. North Carolina

To the extent petitioner seeks an extension of time to prove that he has satisfied a portion of the…