From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bulloch County v. Ritzert

Supreme Court of Georgia
Feb 10, 1958
102 S.E.2d 40 (Ga. 1958)

Opinion

19923.

SUBMITTED JANUARY 13, 1958.

DECIDED FEBRUARY 10, 1958.

Mandamus. Before Judge Renfroe. Bulloch Superior Court. September 25, 1957.

W. G. Neville, Wm. J. Neville, for plaintiff in error.

Cohen Anderson, contra.


1. Mandamus will lie to compel public officers to perform specific acts where the law requires performance thereof as a clear legal duty. Code §§ 64-101, 23-1701; Graham v. Beacham, 189 Ga. 304 ( 5 S.E.2d 775); Hartsfield v. Salem, 213 Ga. 760 ( 101 S.E.2d 701).

2. But the writ of mandamus is personal and issues to the individual to compel performance, and it does not reach the office but is directed against the officer to compel him to perform the required legal duty. 34 Am. Jur. 812, § 7; Bryant v. Mitchell, 195 Ga. 135 ( 23 S.E.2d 410); McCallum v. Bryan, 213 Ga. 669 ( 100 S.E.2d 916). Therefore, the petition brought against Bulloch County to require it to record a contract on the minutes of the Board of Commissioners thereof was subject to the general demurrer and did not allege a cause of action, since it was brought against the county and not the proper officials required by law to perform the specified act. The court erred in overruling the general demurrer to the petition. This rendered nugatory the final order making the mandamus absolute.

Judgment reversed. All the Justices concur.

SUBMITTED JANUARY 13, 1958 — DECIDED FEBRUARY 10, 1958.


Summaries of

Bulloch County v. Ritzert

Supreme Court of Georgia
Feb 10, 1958
102 S.E.2d 40 (Ga. 1958)
Case details for

Bulloch County v. Ritzert

Case Details

Full title:BULLOCH COUNTY v. RITZERT

Court:Supreme Court of Georgia

Date published: Feb 10, 1958

Citations

102 S.E.2d 40 (Ga. 1958)
102 S.E.2d 40

Citing Cases

Carson v. Brown

The writ of mandamus does not reach the office, but is a personal action against the official."); Bulloch…