From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Buell v. San Francisco Savings Union

Supreme Court of California
May 29, 1884
65 Cal. 292 (Cal. 1884)

Opinion

         APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Santa Barbara County, dissolving an injunction.

         COUNSEL:

         W. C. Stratton, for Appellant.

         Chas. Fernald, and H. C. Campbell, for Respondent.


         OPINION

         The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion of the court.

         THE COURT.

         Appeal from an order dissolving an injunction. There was not only no abuse of discretion on the part of the court below in making the order, but the court was clearly right in doing so. If the present defendant, in enforcing the decree of foreclosure, entered in the action brought by it against Buell, violated the stipulation of November 18, 1882, Buell's remedy was in that action, the court having power to control the writ. Besides, it was shown to the court below that the present plaintiff did not comply with the conditions of the stipulation which, according to its provisions, alone entitled him to the stay of the execution of the decree claimed by him.

         Order affirmed.


Summaries of

Buell v. San Francisco Savings Union

Supreme Court of California
May 29, 1884
65 Cal. 292 (Cal. 1884)
Case details for

Buell v. San Francisco Savings Union

Case Details

Full title:R. T. BUELL, APPELLANT, v. SAN FRANCISCO SAVINGS UNION ET AL., RESPONDENTS

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: May 29, 1884

Citations

65 Cal. 292 (Cal. 1884)
4 P. 14

Citing Cases

Michael F. v. Upper Darby Sch. Dist.

Under the proposed IEP, Michael would receive a research-based decoding program, 60 minutes of intervention…

Va. St. Fidelco, L.L.C. v. Orbis Prods. Corp.

Indeed, Robert testified that he recalled Ms. Benedict lending Adron "different sums" of money, and he…