From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Buckles v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Sep 25, 1990
567 So. 2d 40 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Opinion

No. 89-1991.

September 25, 1990.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Ursula M. Ungaro, J.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Valerie Jonas, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Anita J. Gay, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before NESBITT, FERGUSON and COPE, JJ.


Ricky Buckles, defendant below, appeals his conviction for possession of cocaine. In substance defendant contends that the trial court should have granted his motion for mistrial because of a police officer's reference in trial testimony to a handgun discarded by defendant, even though the court's order in limine prohibited any reference to the firearm. The trial court found that the officer's statement was invited by defense counsel and we conclude that there was a record basis for that finding. Even if it is assumed that the statement was not invited, the court sustained the defendant's objection to the testimony and gave a curative instruction. In denying the motion for mistrial, the court acted within the bounds of permissible discretion. See Wilson v. State, 436 So.2d 908, 911 (Fla. 1983); Flowers v. State, 351 So.2d 764 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Buckles v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Sep 25, 1990
567 So. 2d 40 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)
Case details for

Buckles v. State

Case Details

Full title:RICKY BUCKLES, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Sep 25, 1990

Citations

567 So. 2d 40 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Citing Cases

Kivett v. State

However, after every improper comment the trial court instructed the jury to disregard the comment. Thus,…

Jeter v. State

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Melbourne v. State, 679 So.2d 759 (Fla. 1996); Files v. State, 613 So.2d 1301 (Fla.…