From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Buckle v. Avenue Foods, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 22, 1996
232 A.D.2d 269 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

October 22, 1996.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alan Saks, J.), entered July 13, 1995, which denied defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Before: Murphy, P.J., Sullivan, Rubin, Ross and Williams, JJ.


In an action for personal injuries allegedly sustained when plaintiff delivered milk to defendants' supermarket, defendants' motion for summary judgment was properly denied. It was not plaintiffs' burden in opposing the motion to demonstrate the negligence of defendants or the proximate cause of the accident; rather, it was defendants' burden, as movants, to establish the absence of creation of the dangerous condition or notice thereof as a matter of law, where plaintiff submitted proof that he was struck in the head and neck by boxes of canned goods while making a delivery on defendants' premises and without having had any prior contact with the boxes ( Colt v Great Atl. Pac. Tea Co., 209 AD2d 294).


Summaries of

Buckle v. Avenue Foods, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 22, 1996
232 A.D.2d 269 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Buckle v. Avenue Foods, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:VALENTINE BUCKLE et al., Respondents, v. BUHRE AVENUE FOODS, INC., et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 22, 1996

Citations

232 A.D.2d 269 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
648 N.Y.S.2d 100

Citing Cases

Tiles v. City of New York

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Richard Braun, J.). Defendant is not entitled to summary…

Migdol v. City of New York

Before: Tom, J.P., Andrias, Rubin, Buckley, Friedman, JJ. The motion was properly denied on the ground that…