From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Buck v. Ooms

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Feb 3, 1947
159 F.2d 462 (D.C. Cir. 1947)

Opinion

No. 9273.

Argued January 22, 1947.

Decided February 3, 1947.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Columbia.

Action by Charles M. Buck against Casper W. Ooms, Commissioner of Patents, for a patent. Judgment for defendant, 63 F. Supp. 715, and plaintiff appeals.

Affirmed.

Mr. Charles M. Buck, appellant, pro se.

Mr. E.L. Reynolds, United States Patent Office, of Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. W.W. Cochran, Solicitor, United States Patent Office, of Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for appellee.

Before EDGERTON, WILBUR K. MILLER, and PRETTYMAN, Associate Justices.


In this suit under R.S. § 4915, 35 U.S.C. § 63, 35 U.S.C.A. § 63, appellant seeks a patent on a supposed method and means for generating power. The device consists essentially of a combination of a motor-driven pump, an arrangement of pipes somewhat similar to a syphon, a motor operated by water which flows through the pipes, and a pulley operated by this latter motor. Unless the device can deliver more power at the pulley than is supplied to it by the motor that drives the pump, which is impossible, it can serve no useful purpose. The claims were therefore rightly rejected.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Buck v. Ooms

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Feb 3, 1947
159 F.2d 462 (D.C. Cir. 1947)
Case details for

Buck v. Ooms

Case Details

Full title:BUCK v. OOMS, Commissioner of Patents

Court:United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit

Date published: Feb 3, 1947

Citations

159 F.2d 462 (D.C. Cir. 1947)

Citing Cases

Ficara v. Watson

In other words, plaintiff must present clear and conclusive proof to the Court that the ruling of the Patent…