From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Buchsbaum v. Nussbacker, Friedman Goodman

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Jan 15, 1943
179 Misc. 547 (N.Y. App. Term 1943)

Opinion

January 15, 1943.

Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Brooklyn, Sixth District, McNULTY, J.

Max Zucker for appellant.

Joseph H. Schindler for respondent.


Judgment unanimously reversed upon the law, and new trial granted with thirty dollars costs to plaintiff to abide the event.

In the absence of any agreement by plaintiff, express or implied, to pay back any excess of payments on the drawing account over commissions earned, defendant is not entitled to recover such excess from the plaintiff. ( Pease Piano Co. v. Taylor, 197 A.D. 468, affd., 232 N.Y. 504; Carter v. Bradlee, 245 A.D. 49, 52.) It was therefore error to grant judgment dismissing the complaint on the merits and in favor of defendant on its counterclaim. No opinion.

Present — SMITH, McCOOEY and STEINBRINK, JJ.


Summaries of

Buchsbaum v. Nussbacker, Friedman Goodman

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Jan 15, 1943
179 Misc. 547 (N.Y. App. Term 1943)
Case details for

Buchsbaum v. Nussbacker, Friedman Goodman

Case Details

Full title:ISIDORE BUCHSBAUM, Appellant, v. NUSSBACKER, FRIEDMAN GOODMAN, INC.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department

Date published: Jan 15, 1943

Citations

179 Misc. 547 (N.Y. App. Term 1943)
39 N.Y.S.2d 589

Citing Cases

Agnew v. Cameron

Mass. 349 [ 191 N.E.2d 745]; Leighton v. Bancamerica-Blair Corp. (1934) 192 Minn. 223 [255 N.W. 848];…