From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Buchanan v. Kocke

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Nov 9, 2017
155 A.D.3d 1602 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

1278 CAF 17-00758.

11-09-2017

In the Matter of Robert BUCHANAN, Petitioner–Respondent, v. Colleen KOCKE, Respondent–Appellant.

Kenney Shelton Liptak Nowak LLP, Buffalo (Laura J. Emerson of Counsel), for Respondent–Appellant. Emily A. Vella, Springville, for Petitioner–Respondent.


Kenney Shelton Liptak Nowak LLP, Buffalo (Laura J. Emerson of Counsel), for Respondent–Appellant.

Emily A. Vella, Springville, for Petitioner–Respondent.

PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, LINDLEY, NEMOYER, AND CURRAN, JJ.

MEMORANDUM:

In May 2015, petitioner father sought enforcement of the parties' custody and visitation order, which had been entered on consent of the parties in December 2010. In August 2015, the father filed a separate petition for a modification of the consent order, seeking primary placement of the children with him instead of respondent mother. After conducting a hearing on the father's petitions, Family Court concluded that it was not in the children's best interests to change their primary placement and, inter alia, modified the parties' visitation schedule. The court also modified the father's weekly child support obligation despite the fact that the parties had agreed to a different amount in a separate proceeding. We agree with the mother that the court erred in granting the father a downward modification of child support inasmuch as the father did not raise any issue regarding his child support obligation in his petitions (see

Matter of Hayes v. Hayes, 294 A.D.2d 681, 683, 741 N.Y.S.2d 345 [3d Dept.2002] ; see generally Matter of Lewis v. Lewis, 144 A.D.3d 1659, 1661, 41 N.Y.S.3d 824 [4th Dept.2016] ; Matter of Young v. Young, 299 A.D.2d 783, 783–784, 751 N.Y.S.2d 94 [3d Dept.2002] ). We therefore modify the order by vacating the ninth ordering paragraph.

We have reviewed the mother's remaining contention and conclude that it is without merit.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously modified on the law by vacating the ninth ordering paragraph, and as modified the order is affirmed without costs.


Summaries of

Buchanan v. Kocke

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Nov 9, 2017
155 A.D.3d 1602 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

Buchanan v. Kocke

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Robert BUCHANAN, Petitioner–Respondent, v. Colleen KOCKE…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 9, 2017

Citations

155 A.D.3d 1602 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
155 A.D.3d 1602