From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

B.T. Skating Corp. v. County of Nassau

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 23, 1994
204 A.D.2d 586 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

May 23, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Brucia, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The facts in this case are not in dispute. On or about June 18, 1990, the Nassau County Board of Supervisors adopted an ordinance authorizing the Nassau County Executive to execute a five-year licensing agreement with the plaintiff for the design, construction, and operation of a temporary ice skating rink in Nassau County-owned Mitchell Park. A group of taxpayers commenced a lawsuit in the Supreme Court, Nassau County, contending that the license agreement was void and unenforceable because the defendants failed to follow the competitive bidding procedures mandated under General Municipal Law § 103. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the taxpayers who brought the action, and declared that the licensing agreement was void and unenforceable. The plaintiffs, which were parties to the action brought by the taxpayers, unsuccessfully moved for reargument. No appeal was ever taken from the court's original determination.

Thereafter, in or about October 1991, the plaintiffs commenced the instant action seeking damages for labor, services, and equipment allegedly purchased in the expectation that they would have to meet certain deadlines specified in the licensing agreement. The complaint also sought damages resulting from the defendants' alleged negligence in failing to comply with the competitive bidding statutes.

The defendants moved to dismiss the complaint, contending, inter alia, that the court's determination in the prior action brought by the taxpayers was dispositive of the issues presented in the action at bar. The Supreme Court granted the motion and dismissed the complaint. We now affirm.

A party dealing with a municipality is chargeable with knowledge of the statutes which regulate its powers and is bound by them (see, Parsa v. State of New York, 64 N.Y.2d 143, 147). The court's determination in the prior action, finding the subject licensing agreement to be void and unenforceable because the defendants failed to follow the competitive bidding procedures mandated under General Municipal Law § 103, is binding on the plaintiffs in the case at bar, and precludes recovery under the theories advanced in the complaint (see, Gerzof v Sweeney, 22 N.Y.2d 297; see also, Fabrizio Martin v. Board of Educ., 290 F. Supp. 945). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint. Ritter, J.P., Copertino, Santucci and Hart, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

B.T. Skating Corp. v. County of Nassau

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 23, 1994
204 A.D.2d 586 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

B.T. Skating Corp. v. County of Nassau

Case Details

Full title:B.T. SKATING CORP. et al., Appellants, v. COUNTY OF NASSAU et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 23, 1994

Citations

204 A.D.2d 586 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
612 N.Y.S.2d 199

Citing Cases

JLJ Recycling Contractors Corp. v. Town of Babylon

f's contention, it was not entitled to recover the value of the services it provided to the Babylon Recycling…

Haberman v. Zoning Bd.

, Inc. v Amelkin, 62 NY2d 260; Matter of Real Holding Corp. v Lehigh, 2 NY3d 297; Matter of Emmett v Town of…