From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brye v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Aug 12, 1996
677 So. 2d 1357 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Summary

finding that defendant presented a prima facie showing of entitlement to relief on the ground of ineffective assistance of counsel by alleging that counsel knew or should have known that prior uncounseled convictions were unscoreable

Summary of this case from Montoya v. State

Opinion

No. 96-914.

August 12, 1996.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Escambia County, Michael Jones, J.

No brief filed for Appellant.

No brief filed for Appellee.


Appellant seeks review of the trial court's order denying his motion for post-conviction relief, filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm the denial of appellant's claim that his sentence is illegal in that certain uncounseled convictions were improperly scored in the calculation of his guidelines sentence. This claim may not be raised for the first time by a motion for post-conviction relief. See State v. Lindsey, 560 So.2d 406 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990); Stewart v. State, 511 So.2d 375 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); Lomont v. State, 506 So.2d 1141 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987).

However, we must reverse the summary denial of appellant's alternative claim for relief that trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance in that (1) counsel knew or should have known that the prior uncounseled convictions were unscoreable; (2) counsel failed to bring this to the sentencing court's attention; and (3) inclusion of these offenses on the guidelines scoresheet affected the recommended sentence. We find that appellant's allegations presented a prima facie showing of entitlement to relief, enough to require something more than summary denial thereof. See Manuel v. State, 629 So.2d 1052 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993); Register v. State, 619 So.2d 498 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993); Pettway v. State, 502 So.2d 1353 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987); Lanier v. State, 478 So.2d 1184 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985). We remand to the trial court with directions to either afford appellant a hearing on his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel or to attach those portions of the record sufficient to refute the claim.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; REMANDED with directions.

ALLEN and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Brye v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Aug 12, 1996
677 So. 2d 1357 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

finding that defendant presented a prima facie showing of entitlement to relief on the ground of ineffective assistance of counsel by alleging that counsel knew or should have known that prior uncounseled convictions were unscoreable

Summary of this case from Montoya v. State
Case details for

Brye v. State

Case Details

Full title:GRADY R. BRYE, SR., APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Aug 12, 1996

Citations

677 So. 2d 1357 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Citing Cases

Parson v. State

The trial court erred in summarily denying this claim on the grounds that it should have been brought on…

Montoya v. State

We agree. See State v. Beach, 592 So.2d 237 (Fla. 1992); Brye v. State, 677 So.2d 1357 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996)…