From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bryant v. Wolf

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Nov 21, 2019
No. 19-2053 (4th Cir. Nov. 21, 2019)

Opinion

No. 19-2053

11-21-2019

THEODORE BRYANT, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CHAD WOLF, Acting Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, Defendant - Appellee.

Theodore Bryant, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Ellen L. Hollander, District Judge. (1:18-cv-01183-ELH) Before WILKINSON and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Theodore Bryant, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Theodore Bryant appeals the district court's order dismissing his employment discrimination complaint in part and granting summary judgment to Appellee on the remainder of the action. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant's brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Bryant's informal brief does not challenge the bases for the district court's disposition, Bryant has forfeited appellate review of the court's order. See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) ("The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief."). Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Bryant v. Wolf

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Nov 21, 2019
No. 19-2053 (4th Cir. Nov. 21, 2019)
Case details for

Bryant v. Wolf

Case Details

Full title:THEODORE BRYANT, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CHAD WOLF, Acting Secretary…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Nov 21, 2019

Citations

No. 19-2053 (4th Cir. Nov. 21, 2019)

Citing Cases

Maine v. Azar

At the outset, courts generally find that poor performance evaluations do not rise to the level of adverse or…