From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bryan v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Oct 27, 2021
329 So. 3d 216 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

No. 1D21-2918

10-27-2021

Ricardo BRYAN, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Ricardo Bryan, pro se, Petitioner. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.


Ricardo Bryan, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

Petitioner has filed a petition alleging ineffective assistance of his trial counsel concerning a petition for writ of prohibition filed during the pendency of his criminal trial case. Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(d) does not provide a vehicle to challenge the effectiveness of trial counsel. Sanders v. State , 135 So. 3d 413, 414 n.1 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014). Accordingly, the Court dismisses the petition.

Ray, Osterhaus, and Nordby, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Bryan v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Oct 27, 2021
329 So. 3d 216 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)
Case details for

Bryan v. State

Case Details

Full title:Ricardo BRYAN, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Date published: Oct 27, 2021

Citations

329 So. 3d 216 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)