From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bruzzi v. Syosset Sport Center

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 28, 2000
277 A.D.2d 413 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Argued October 31, 2000.

November 28, 2000.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (DiNoto, J.), entered July 13, 1999, as, upon a jury verdict finding that the defendants Warren Eckel and Brian Eckel were not at fault in causing the plaintiff's injuries, failed to award damages against those defendants.

Amrod Vanderwaag, Garden City, N.Y. (John Amrod and Robert Vanderwaag of counsel), for appellant.

Peter T. Connor, Garden City, N.Y., for respondents.

Before: DAVID S. RITTER, J.P., MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, HOWARD MILLER, NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Contrary to the plaintiff's contention, the judgment properly did not award damages against the individual defendants Warren Eckel and Brian Eckel (hereinafter the Eckels) as the jury did not render a verdict against those defendants. The jury specifically found that the Eckels were not at fault in causing the plaintiff's injuries. The plaintiff contends that the Eckels, who are the principals of the corporate defendant Syosset Sport Center, Inc. (hereinafter Syosset Sport), should be liable for acts of the corporation. The plaintiff, however, did not present any evidence that would justify piercing the corporate veil to impose liability on the Eckels (see, Matter of Morris v. New York State Dept. of Taxation Finance, 82 N.Y.2d 135). Moreover, there was no evidence that the jury verdict was reported incorrectly or that there was substantial confusion among the jurors in reaching the verdict. Accordingly, there is no reason to order a new trial (see, Bedell v. Hornick, 245 A.D.2d 538).

The issues raised by the respondents regarding the liability of Syosset Sport are not properly before us as Syosset Sport did not appeal from the judgment (see, Bardi v. Mosher, 197 A.D.2d 797).


Summaries of

Bruzzi v. Syosset Sport Center

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 28, 2000
277 A.D.2d 413 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Bruzzi v. Syosset Sport Center

Case Details

Full title:JOHN BRUZZI, APPELLANT, v. SYOSSET SPORT CENTER, INC., ETC., ET AL.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 28, 2000

Citations

277 A.D.2d 413 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
716 N.Y.S.2d 895

Citing Cases

Old Republic National Title Ins. v. Moskowitz

In opposition to this motion, Edward Moskowitz failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to his liability.…

Bruzzi v. Syosset Sport Center, Inc.

Decided October 18, 2001. Appeal from the App. Div., 2nd Dept: 277 A.D.2d 413. Motion for leave to appeal…