Opinion
02 Civ. 1372 (LAK)
September 6, 2002
ORDER
Defendants move for reconsideration of so much of the Court's order, dated August 21, 2002, as denied their motion to dismiss a particular aspect of plaintiff's Title IX claim, suggesting that the Court overlooked their argument.
The Court did not overlook defendants' argument. As the order stated:
"Plaintiff's Title IX claim, however, is broader in that plaintiff complains also that the Iona women's basketball program was treated less advantageously than the men's program and seeks a remedy placing the women's program on an equal footing. While it is far from clear that plaintiff has standing to sue under Title IX for such relief or, for that matter, for any damages she may have suffered as a consequence of any Title IX violation separate and apart from alleged employment discrimination, the Court does not consider the papers before it an adequate basis upon which to decide that question and declines to do so without proper briefing."
The request for reconsideration, which is supported by literally nothing beyond the resubmission of the relevant part of a brief already found to be insufficient to decide this substantial issue, is frivolous.
Motion denied.
SO ORDERED.