From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bruno v. Bruno

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 1, 2002
296 A.D.2d 366 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

2001-10127

Submitted May 28, 2002

July 1, 2002.

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for conversion, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Lefkowitz, J.), entered October 22, 2001, which granted the defendants' motion to vacate their default in answering.

Charles T. Bistany, White Plains, N.Y., for appellant.

John N. Romano, Yonkers, N.Y., for respondents.

DAVID S. RITTER, J.P., MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, NANCY E. SMITH, GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion is denied.

In support of their motion to vacate their default pursuant to CPLR 5015(a)(1), the defendants failed to demonstrate both a reasonable excuse for their default and a meritorious defense to the action (see Kolajo v. City of New York, 248 A.D.2d 512; Roussodimou v. Zafiriadis, 238 A.D.2d 568). Thus, the Supreme Court erred in granting such relief.

The defendants' remaining contentions are without merit (see Perez v. Astoria Gen. Hosp., 260 A.D.2d 457; Miles v. Blue Label Trucking, 232 A.D.2d 382; Brosnan v. Behette, 186 A.D.2d 165; Modern Indus. Bank v. Grossman, 180 Misc. 415; Lang v. Lang, 176 Misc. 213).

RITTER, J.P., ALTMAN, SMITH and GOLDSTEIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Bruno v. Bruno

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 1, 2002
296 A.D.2d 366 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

Bruno v. Bruno

Case Details

Full title:MARY R. BRUNO, appellant, v. LAWRENCE BRUNO, et al., respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 1, 2002

Citations

296 A.D.2d 366 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
745 N.Y.S.2d 433