From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brumitte v. Astrue

United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Knoxville
Sep 29, 2009
No.: 3:08-CV-53 (E.D. Tenn. Sep. 29, 2009)

Opinion

No.: 3:08-CV-53.

September 29, 2009


(VARLAN/SHIRLEY)

ORDER


This Social Security appeal is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation filed by United States Magistrate Judge C. Clifford Shirley, Jr. [Doc. 26]. There have been no timely objections to the report and recommendation, and enough time has passed since the filing of the report and recommendation to treat any objections as having been waived. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). In his report and recommendation, Magistrate Judge Shirley recommended that plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees and Costs [Doc. 23], made pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, be denied.

The Court has carefully reviewed this matter, including the motion for attorney fees [Doc. 23], and defendant Commissioner of Social Security's Response to Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees and Costs [Doc. 25]. The Court is in agreement with Magistrate Judge Shirley's report and recommendation, which the Court adopts and incorporates into its ruling. Accordingly, plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees and Costs [Doc. 23] is hereby DENIED. The Court ACCEPTS IN WHOLE the Report and Recommendation [Doc. 26].

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Brumitte v. Astrue

United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Knoxville
Sep 29, 2009
No.: 3:08-CV-53 (E.D. Tenn. Sep. 29, 2009)
Case details for

Brumitte v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:DEBORAH JOAN BRUMITTE, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Knoxville

Date published: Sep 29, 2009

Citations

No.: 3:08-CV-53 (E.D. Tenn. Sep. 29, 2009)

Citing Cases

L.H. v. Hamilton Cnty. Dep't of Educ.

Fox , 563 U.S. at 838, 131 S.Ct. 2205."Whether quarter-hour billing is reasonable is a matter within the…