From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bruce v. Commissioner of Social Security

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Western Division
Aug 18, 2011
Case No. 3:10 CV 1954 (N.D. Ohio Aug. 18, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 3:10 CV 1954.

August 18, 2011


ORDER


The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation ("R R") of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. No. 15). Under the relevant statute ( 28 U.S.C. § 636(C)):

Within fourteen days after being served with a copy, any party may serve and file written objections to such proposed findings and recommendations as provided by rules of court. A judge of the court shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made.

In this case, Defendant chose not to file any objections (Doc. No. 16). The failure to file written objections constitutes a waiver of a de novo determination by the district court of an issue covered in the R R. United States v. Sullivan, 431 F.3d 976, 984 (6th Cir. 2005).

The Court has reviewed the R R, finds it to be correct, and adopts it in its entirety. The Commissioner's decision denying disability benefits is reversed and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with the R R.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Bruce v. Commissioner of Social Security

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Western Division
Aug 18, 2011
Case No. 3:10 CV 1954 (N.D. Ohio Aug. 18, 2011)
Case details for

Bruce v. Commissioner of Social Security

Case Details

Full title:Eugene D. Bruce Plaintiff, v. Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Western Division

Date published: Aug 18, 2011

Citations

Case No. 3:10 CV 1954 (N.D. Ohio Aug. 18, 2011)

Citing Cases

Flynn v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Similarly, last year this Court remanded an ALJ's decision for failing to adequately consider the…