From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. World Financial Properties

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 9, 2003
306 A.D.2d 303 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2002-06684

Submitted May 14, 2003.

June 9, 2003.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant World Financial Properties, Inc., f/k/a Olympia and York, Inc., appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Milano, J.), dated May 10, 2002, as only conditionally granted its motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3216 for failure to prosecute.

Peter J. Creedon, Melville, N.Y. (Deirdre J. Tobin of counsel), for appellant.

Before: DAVID S. RITTER, J.P., SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, LEO F. McGINITY, SANDRA L. TOWNES, BARRY A. COZIER, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted unconditionally, and the complaint is dismissed.

Having been served with a 90-day notice pursuant to CPLR 3216, the plaintiff should have complied with the notice by filing a note of issue or should have moved, before the default date, either to vacate the notice or extend the 90-day period (see Baczkowski v. Collins Constr. Co., 89 N.Y.2d 499, 503; Stuckey v. Westchester County Dept. of Transp., 298 A.D.2d 577, lv denied 100 N.Y.2d 502 [May 6, 2003]; Raffa v. Cook, 289 A.D.2d 385; Wechsler v. First Unum Life Ins. Co, 295 A.D.2d 340). The plaintiff failed to do so. Accordingly, to avoid dismissal, the plaintiff was required to demonstrate both a justifiable excuse for the delay in properly responding to the 90-day notice and the existence of a meritorious cause of action (see Baczkowski v. Collins Constr., Co. supra at 503; Stuckey v. Westchester County Dept. of Transp., supra). The plaintiff did not demonstrate a justifiable excuse, nor did she demonstrate a meritorious cause of action (see Rubin v. Baglio, 234 A.D.2d 534; Longacre Corp. v. Better Hosp. Equip. Corp., 228 A.D.2d 653; Aalbue v. Flaherty, 202 A.D.2d 381) . Therefore, the Supreme Court improperly relieved the plaintiff of her default.

RITTER, J.P., FEUERSTEIN, McGINITY, TOWNES and COZIER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Brown v. World Financial Properties

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 9, 2003
306 A.D.2d 303 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Brown v. World Financial Properties

Case Details

Full title:ELISA BROWN, respondent, v. WORLD FINANCIAL PROPERTIES, INC., f/k/a…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 9, 2003

Citations

306 A.D.2d 303 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
760 N.Y.S.2d 668

Citing Cases

Wells Fargo Bank v. Roshe

Having been served with a 90-day notice pursuant to CPLR §3216, the Plaintiff was required to either file a…

Vasquez v. State

With no dispute that the cross motion to dismiss fully complied with all conditions precedent ( see CPLR…