From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Walker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 5, 2013
No. C 09-04663 JSW (N.D. Cal. Mar. 5, 2013)

Opinion

No. C 09-04663 JSW

03-05-2013

DARRYL W. BROWN, Petitioner, v. JAMES WALKER, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER SETTING BRIEFING

SCHEDULE AND EVIDENTIARY

HEARING AND VACATING

CASE MANAGEMENT

CONFERENCE

The Court HEREBY SETS the briefing schedule for an evidentiary hearing concerning: (1) the nature and extent of the putative conflict between Petitioner and his trial attorney; and (2) whether that putative conflict deprived Petitioner of the representation he was guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment.

Petitioner shall file his supplemental brief within 45 days; Respondent shall file his supplemental brief within 30 days thereafter; Petitioner may file a reply brief within 15 days thereafter. At the conclusion of briefing, the parties shall submit a stipulation setting out a hearing date, available on this Court's calendar, for the evidentiary hearing.

The Court VACATES the case management conference set for March 8, 2013.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_____________

JEFFREY S. WHITE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Brown v. Walker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 5, 2013
No. C 09-04663 JSW (N.D. Cal. Mar. 5, 2013)
Case details for

Brown v. Walker

Case Details

Full title:DARRYL W. BROWN, Petitioner, v. JAMES WALKER, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 5, 2013

Citations

No. C 09-04663 JSW (N.D. Cal. Mar. 5, 2013)