holding that § 2255 had not been inadequate or ineffective to test the legality of the petitioner's conviction where the petitioner "[had] not been denied an unobstructed procedural opportunity to present [his claim]"
Summary of this case from Abdullah v. HedrickNo. 03-7139.
December 1, 2003.
C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 337 F. 3d 792.
holding that § 2255 had not been inadequate or ineffective to test the legality of the petitioner's conviction where the petitioner "[had] not been denied an unobstructed procedural opportunity to present [his claim]"
Summary of this case from Abdullah v. HedrickFull title:BROWN v. UNITED STATES
Court:U.S.
Date published: Dec 1, 2003
Robinson's due process claim fails, as well. He argues, citing United States v. Quinones, 205 F.Supp.2d 256…
U.S. v. MoussaouiBoth aspects of the sanction are appealable under § 3731 — the latter under the text of the statute itself,…