From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Underwood

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Oct 28, 2019
No. 3:19-cv-1706-B (N.D. Tex. Oct. 28, 2019)

Opinion

No. 3:19-cv-1706-B

10-28-2019

DANIEL BROWN (BOP Register No. 76273-083), Petitioner, v. WARDEN UNDERWOOD, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS , CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in this case. No objections were filed. The District Court reviewed the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

SO ORDERED.

DATED: October 28, 2019.

/s/ _________

JANE J. BOYLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Brown v. Underwood

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Oct 28, 2019
No. 3:19-cv-1706-B (N.D. Tex. Oct. 28, 2019)
Case details for

Brown v. Underwood

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL BROWN (BOP Register No. 76273-083), Petitioner, v. WARDEN…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Oct 28, 2019

Citations

No. 3:19-cv-1706-B (N.D. Tex. Oct. 28, 2019)

Citing Cases

Whisneant v. Warden

And “[i]f petitioner . . . seeks to file his own motion for compassionate release, such a motion must be…

Smith v. Warden, FCC Beaumont Low

And “[i]f petitioner . . . seeks to file his own motion for compassionate release, such a motion must be…