From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. State

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma
Feb 21, 1922
21 Okla. Crim. 26 (Okla. Crim. App. 1922)

Opinion

No. A-3798.

Opinion Filed February 21, 1922.

(Syllabus.)

Larceny — Grand Larceny — Sufficient Evidence. In a prosecution for grand larceny, evidence considered, and held sufficient to support the conviction, and no reversible error was committed on the trial.

Appeal from District Court, Jackson County; Frank Mathews, Judge.

C.M. Brown was convicted of grand larceny, and he appeals. Affirmed.

S.B. Garrett, for plaintiff in error.

The Attorney General and E.L. Fulton, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.


Plaintiff in error, C.M. Brown, was convicted on a charge of grand larceny, and was sentenced to be imprisoned in the penitentiary for a term of two years. From the judgment an appeal was taken by filing in this court on June 21, 1920, a petition in error with case-made. No brief has been filed and no appearance made on behalf of plaintiff in error in this court. When the case was called on the assignment, it was submitted on the record.

The information charges the theft of 750 pounds of seed cotton, of the value of $134.45, the personal property of I.V. Pendergrass. The evidence for the state to support the allegations of the information is undisputed. The information is sufficient, and the instructions of the court fully cover the law of the case. Finding no prejudicial error in the record, the judgment of the lower court is affirmed.

MATSON and BESSEY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Brown v. State

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma
Feb 21, 1922
21 Okla. Crim. 26 (Okla. Crim. App. 1922)
Case details for

Brown v. State

Case Details

Full title:C.M. BROWN v. STATE

Court:Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma

Date published: Feb 21, 1922

Citations

21 Okla. Crim. 26 (Okla. Crim. App. 1922)
204 P. 314

Citing Cases

Union Pac. R. Co. et al. v. Public Service Commission

People v. McAllister, 10 Utah 357, 37 P. 578; State v. Carmen, 44 Utah 353, 140 P. 670; University of Utah v.…

Robinett v. Price

EMINENT DOMAIN — DEPRECIATION IN PROPERTY AND RENTAL VALUE INACCESSIBILITY TO BUSINESS SECTION BY CLOSING…