From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 14, 1999
731 So. 2d 773 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Opinion

No. 97-3639

Opinion filed April 14, 1999. JANUARY TERM, A.D. 1999

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Jerald Bagley, Judge, L.T. No. 95-3763.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Robert Godfrey, Assistant Public Defender, and Beth C. Weitzner, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General and Barbara A. Zappi, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., JORGENSON, and GREEN, JJ.


This appeal arises from a final judgment of conviction and sentence for first degree murder, armed robbery, and armed burglary after a jury trial. Based upon the supreme court's recent decision in Miller v. State, No. 85,744 (Fla. Apr. 1, 1999), we reverse the appellant's conviction and sentence for armed burglary.

Section 810.02(1), Florida Statutes (1995), defines burglary as the "entering or remaining in a dwelling, a structure or a conveyance with the intent to commit an offense therein,unless the premises are at the time open to the public or the defendant is licensed or invited to enter or remain." (emphasis added). In Miller, the supreme court held that if a defendant establishes that the premises were open to the public, then this is a complete defense. See No. 85,744 at 3; see also Collett v. State, 676 So.2d 1046, 1047 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996) (reasoning that "[P]remises are either open to the public or they are not, and the fact that persons with criminal intent have not been given permission to enter has no effect on whether premises are open to the public."); Ray v. State, 522 So.2d 963, 976 n.6 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988) (stating "that the premises are open to the public is a complete defense to a burglary charge[.]"). The state properly concedes that the grocery store was open to the public when the appellant and his co-defendants entered the same. The appellant thus met his burden of establishing the affirmative defense of consent. See Miller, No. 85,744 at 4. We therefore reverse his conviction and sentence for armed burglary.

We find no merit to appellant's remaining issue on appeal and accordingly, affirm his conviction and sentences on the remaining two counts.

Reversed in part and affirmed in part.


Summaries of

Brown v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 14, 1999
731 So. 2d 773 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)
Case details for

Brown v. State

Case Details

Full title:CLARENCE GERALD BROWN, Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Apr 14, 1999

Citations

731 So. 2d 773 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Citing Cases

Vargas v. State

It is a complete defense to the charge of burglary if the defendant can establish that the premises were open…