From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Aug 22, 2007
963 So. 2d 342 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

Summary

finding error in imposition of cost pursuant to section 938.10 where the victim was not a minor

Summary of this case from Gonzalez v. State

Opinion

No. 2D05-2118.

August 22, 2007.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Lee County, Thomas S. Reese, J.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Brad Permar, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Tonja Rene Vickers, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.


James Lamars Brown appeals his convictions and sentences for armed trespassing and aggravated battery with a deadly weapon. We affirm Brown's convictions without comment but strike certain costs imposed by the trial court.

The State concedes that the trial court erred in imposing $25 in costs of prosecution pursuant to section 938.27(1), Florida Statutes (2004), because the State failed to request or provide documentation to support the cost. See Ortiz v. State, 884 So.2d 77 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004). On remand, this cost may be reimposed if the statutory requirements are met. See Diaz v. State, 901 So.2d 310 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005). The State further concedes error in the $16.25 cost imposed pursuant to section 938.10, Florida Statutes (2004), which authorizes the imposition of additional costs in cases of certain crimes against minors, because the victim was not a minor. Finally, the trial court's imposition of a $200 cost for the Local Government Criminal Justice Trust Fund pursuant to section 27.3455, Florida Statutes, was error because that statute was repealed, effective July 1, 2004, prior to the date Brown's offenses were committed. See Ch. 03-402, § 153, at 2718, Laws of Fla.

Convictions affirmed; costs award stricken; remanded.

STRINGER and DAVIS, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Brown v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Aug 22, 2007
963 So. 2d 342 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

finding error in imposition of cost pursuant to section 938.10 where the victim was not a minor

Summary of this case from Gonzalez v. State

applying § 938.27, Fla. Stat.

Summary of this case from Hills v. State
Case details for

Brown v. State

Case Details

Full title:James Lamars BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Aug 22, 2007

Citations

963 So. 2d 342 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

Citing Cases

Hills v. State

Historically, imposition of “costs of prosecution” was discretionary and therefore required a request by the…

Gonzalez v. State

Because this case did not involve a crime against minors, we reverse imposition of this cost and direct the…