From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Spaulding

Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack
Dec 1, 1885
7 A. 381 (N.H. 1885)

Opinion

Decided December, 1885.

CASE, for crim. con. Facts found by the court.

Davis Paige and F. H. Gould, for the plaintiff.

Albin Martin, for the defendant.


It does not appear that the plaintiff's original cause of action was extinguished by hi subsequent prospective agreement.

Case discharged.

CARPENTER, J., did not sit: the others concurred.


Summaries of

Brown v. Spaulding

Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack
Dec 1, 1885
7 A. 381 (N.H. 1885)
Case details for

Brown v. Spaulding

Case Details

Full title:BROWN v. SPAULDING

Court:Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack

Date published: Dec 1, 1885

Citations

7 A. 381 (N.H. 1885)
7 A. 381

Citing Cases

Missoula Etc. Bk. v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co.

The rule in such states, including Montana, is set forth in sections 1745 and 1748, Id., and is to the effect…

B. A. Railroad Co. v. Hand

Plaintiff's counsel, on this point, waived his rights under the stipulation quoted above and generously…